Cultural and aesthetic functions of Soviet and Russian metro
https://doi.org/10.31675/1607-1859-2021-23-1-34-49
Abstract
The article examines the cultural and aesthetic function in the large closed space, namely the metro, where the need for variety, including aesthetic, is most clearly manifested. The metro diversity is a necessary socio-economic function.
The metro variety is realized through the use of cultural and aesthetic functions that reflect the history and culture. A dramatic expansion of diversity were first used in the design and construction of the Moscow metro.
Such an experience is analyzed using the architecture of the Moscow and Novosibirsk subways. It is shown that the cultural and aesthetic functions remain unchanged despite the change in architectural styles. Over time, the development of such techniques is observed. In addition to the fundamental techniques, which underlie the architectural design of stations, temporary exhibitions appear that reflect the culture and history of the metro and the city. All this contributes to the diversity of the metro environment and maintains the favorable conditions for the society and culture. In particular, the tourist potential and information about the city are being developed. Therefore, the aesthetic diversity can be considered as an important function of the metro.
About the Authors
A. V. KinshtRussian Federation
Aleksandr V. Kinsht, DSc
38, Krasnyi Ave., 630099, Novosibirsk
A. A. Shamets
Russian Federation
Andrei A. Shamets, Student
38, Krasnyi Ave., 630099, Novosibirsk
References
1. Okhrana landshaftov [Landscape protection. Explanatory dictionary]. Moscow: Progress, 1982. 272 p. (rus)
2. Reimers N.F. Ekologiya (teorii, zakony, pravila, printsipy i gipotezy) [Ecology (theories, laws, rules, principles and hypotheses]. Moscow: Rossiya Molodaya, 1994. 367 p. (rus)
3. Kinsht A.V. Sredovoi podhod i okruzhayuschaya sreda v arhitekture i gradostroitelstve: ekologicheskii vzglyad [Environmental approach to architecture and town planning]. Vestnik of Tomsk State University of Architecture and Building. 2017. No. 3. Pp. 40–47. (rus)
4. Videoekologiya [Video ecology]. Available: www.videoecology.com/author.html (accessed May 12, 2020) (rus)
5. Snegirev V. Arhitekturnoe nasledie V. I. Bazhenova [Bazhenov’s architectural heritage]. Moscow, 1937. 21 p. (rus)
6. Uznai Moskvu [Discover Moscow]. Available: https://um.mos.ru/routes/moskovskoe-metropo-stantsiyam-obektam-kulturnogo-naslediya/ (rus)
7. Posokhin M.V. Gorod dlya cheloveka [City for human]. Moscow: Progress, 1980. 220 p. (rus)
8. Arhitektura Novosibirska [Architecture of Novosibirsk]. Available: http://nsk.novosibdom.ru/node/2323 (accessed April 9, 2020) (rus)
9. Arhitektura Novosibirska [Architecture of Novosibirsk]. Available: http://nsk.novosibdom.ru/node/2324 (accessed April 9, 2020) (rus)
10. Mir metro [Metro world]. Available: www.mirmetro.net/novosibirsk/lines/dzerzhinskaya/12_marshala_pokryshkina (accessed April 9, 2020) (rus)
11. Mir metro [Metro world]. Available: www.mirmetro.net/novosibirsk/lines/leninskaya/11_gagarinskaya (accessed April 9, 2020) (rus)
Review
For citations:
Kinsht A.V., Shamets A.A. Cultural and aesthetic functions of Soviet and Russian metro. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo arkhitekturno-stroitel'nogo universiteta. JOURNAL of Construction and Architecture. 2021;23(1):34-49. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31675/1607-1859-2021-23-1-34-49