Determination of Allowable Damage Factor of Antiseismic Structures
Abstract
The paper presents the analysis of known calculation techniques related to the allowable damage factor. This technique is based on accounting for different stiffness of elastic and elasto-plastic systems. A method is suggested to detect the maximum permissible level of plastic deformation of a structure. The analysis of the proposed methodology of determining the allowable damage factor confirms that the popular construction materials (masonry) values can be obtained that ensure the correct reflection of the structural plastic deformation under seismic loads.
About the Authors
Oleg V. Kabantsev
National Research Moscow State University of Civil Engineering
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Emil' S. Useinov
Tomsk State University of Architecture and Building
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Shamsuddin Sharipov
National Research Moscow State University of Civil Engineering
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Aizenberg Ya.M. Spitakskoe zemletryasenie 7 dekabrya 1988 goda. Nekotorye uroki i vyvody [Spitak earthquake on December 7, 1988. Some lessons and conclusions]. Seismostoikoe stroitel'stvo. Bezopasnost' sooruzhenii. 1999. No. 1. Pp. 6–9. (rus)
2. Andreev O.O., Oizerman V.I. Uroki zemletryaseniya. Obshchie vyvody [Lessons of earthquake. General conclusions]. Karpatskoe zemletryasenie 1986 g. Kishinev, 1990. Pp. 323–325. (rus)
3. Martem'yanov A.I., Alekseenkov D.A., Kilimnik L.Sh. Gazliiskoe zemletryasenie 1984 g.: Analiz povedeniya zdanii i inzhenernykh sooruzhenii [Gazli earthquake 1984: Analysis of structural behavior]. Moscow : Nauka Publ., 1988. 118 p. (rus)
4. Kabantsev O.V. Makroseismicheskii effekt zemletryaseniya 4 oktyabrya 1994 g. na ostrovakh Iturup, Kunashir, Shikotan [Microseismic effect of earthquake 4 October 1994 on the Iturup, Kunashir, Shikotan islands]. Moscow : Gosstroy Publ., 1995. No. 4. Pp. 7–11. (rus)
5. Banon H., Veneziano D. Seismic safety of reinforced concrete members and structures. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics. 1982. V. 10. Pp. 179–193.
6. Banon H., John H. Biggs seismic damage in reinforced concrete frame. Journal of Structural Deviation. 1981. V. 107. No. 9. Pp. 1713–1729.
7. Cosenza E., Manfredi G., Ramasco R. An evaluation of damage functional in earthquake resistant. Eur. Conf. Earthquake Engineering. Moscow, 1990. V. 9. Pp. 303–312.
8. Cosenza E., Manfredi G., Ramasco R. The use of damage function in earthquake engineering: a comparison between different methods. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics. 1993. V. 22. Pp. 855–869.
9. Darwin. D., Nmai C.K. Energy dissipation in RC beams under cyclic load. J. Struct, Eng. ASCE 112. 1986. Pp. 1829–1846.
10. Fajfar P., Vidic T., Fischinger M. A measure of earthquake motion capacity to damage medium-period structures. Soil Dynamic and Earthquake Engineering. 1990. No. 9. Pp. 236–242.
11. Kunnath S.K., Reinhorn A. M., Park Y. J. Analytical modeling of inelastic seismic response of R/C structure. Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE 116. 1990. Pp. 996–1017.
12. Nadim F., Moghtaderi Zadeh M. The Bam earthquake of 26 December 2003. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 2. 2004. Pp. 119–153. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Printed in the Netherlands.
13. Rahai A., Nemati S. Concrete structures, evaluation of behavior and strengthening method. 2003. 362 p.
14. Newmark N., Rozenblyuet E., Aizenberg M. Osnovy seismostoikogo stroitel'stva [Basics of earthquake engineering]. Moscow, 1980. 344 p. (rus)
15. Rutman Yu L., Simbort E. Vybor koeffitsienta reduktsii seismicheskikh nagruzok na osnove analiza plasticheskogo resursa konstruktsii [Selection of reduction coefficient based on seismic loads analysis of plastic resource]. Vestnik grazhdanskikh inzhenerov. 2011. No. 27. Pp. 78–81. (rus)
16. Simbort E. Metodika vybora koeffitsienta reduktsii seismicheskikh nagruzok pri zadannom urovne koeffitsienta plastichnosti [Selection of seismic load reduction coefficient for a given level of plasticity coefficient]. Inzhenerno-stroitel'nyi zhurnal. 2012. No. 1. Pp. 44–52. (rus)
17. Mkrtychev O.V., Dzhinchvelashvili G.A. Problemy ucheta nelineinostei v teorii seismostoikosti (gipotezy i zabluzhdeniya) [Problems of non-linearities in earthquake resistance theory (hypothesis and misconceptions)]. Moscow : MGSU Publ., 2012. 192 p. (rus)
18. Zharnitskii V.I., Golda Yu.L., Avdeeva S.O. Otsenka seismostoikosti zdanii i povrezhdenii ego konstruktsii na osnove dinamicheskogo rascheta s uchetom plasticheskikh deformatsii materialov [Estimation of seismic stability of buildings and damages based on dynamic analysis and plastic deformation]. Seismostoikoe stroitel'stvo. Bezopasnost' sooruzhenii. 1999. No. 4. Pp. 7–8. (rus)
19. ¬¬19. Zharnitskii V.I., Zabegaev A.V. Razvitie teorii seismostoikosti zhelezobetonnykh konstruktsii [Theory development of seismic resistance of reinforced concrete structures]. Proc. 1st All-Rus. Sci. Conf. ‘Concrete at the turn of the third century‘. Moscow, 2001. V. 2. Pp. 655–658. (rus)
20. Nikiforovskii V.N., Shemyakin E.I. Dinamicheskoe razrushenie tverdykh tel [Dynamic fracture of solids]. Novosibirsk : Nauka Publ., 1979. 271 p. (rus)
21. Nikolaevskii V.N. Dinamicheskaya prochnost' i skorost' razrusheniya [Dynamic strength and rate of destruction]. Mekhanika. Udar, vzryv i razrushenie. 1981. No. 26. Pp. 166–203. (rus)
22. Panin V. E., Likhachev V.A., Grinyaev Yu.V. Strukturnye urovni deformatsii tverdykh tel [Structural levels of deformation of solids]. Novosibirsk : Nauka Publ., 1985. 163 p. (rus)
23. Fudzuki T., Dzako M. Fracture mechanics of composite materials. Moscow : Mir Publ., 1982. 232 p. (transl. from Jap.)
24. Kabantsev O.V., Tonkikh G.P., Koshaev V.V., Eremin V.Ya., Tikhonov M.V. Eksperimental'nye issledovaniya nesushchei sposobnosti kamennoi kladki s treshchinami pri ikh in"etsirovanii tsementnym rastvorom po razryadno-impul'snoi tekhnologii [Experimental study of bearing capacity of masonry cracked when injected with cement mortar by discharge-pulse technology]. Scientific and Technical Journal on Construction and Architecture. 2011. No. 2. Pp. 127–135. (rus)
25. Kopanitsa D.G., Kabantsev O.V., Useinov E.S. Eksperimental'nye issledovaniya fragmentov kirpichnoi kladki na deistvie staticheskoi i dinamicheskoi nagruzki [Experimental studies of masonry fragments under static and dynamic loads]. Vestnik TSUAB. 2012. No. 4. Pp. 157–178. (rus)
26. Tonkikh G.P., Koshaev V.V., Kabantsev O.V. Eksperimental'nye issledovaniya nesushchei sposobnosti kombinirovannoi kamennoi kladki pri glavnykh nagruzkakh [Experimental study of masonry bearing capacity combined with main loads]. Seismostoikoe stroitel'stvo. Bezopasnost' sooruzhenii. 2007. No. 6. Pp. 26–31. (rus)
27. Tonkikh G.P., Kabantsev O.V., Simako, O.A., Simakov A.B., Baev S.M., Panfilov P.S. Eksperimentalnye issledovaniia seismousileniia kamennoi kladki naruzhnymi betonnymi applikatciiami [Experimental research of seismic reinforcement of masonry by exterior concrete applications]. Seismostoikoe stroitelstvo. Bezopasnost sooruzhenii. 2011. No. 2. Pp. 35–42. (rus)
28. Popov N.N., Rastorguev B.S., Zabegaev A.V. Raschet konstruktsii na dinamicheskie i spetsial'nye nagruzki [Structural analysis of dynamic and specific loads]. Moscow : Vysshaya Shkola Publ., 1992. 319 p. (rus)
Review
For citations:
Kabantsev O.V., Useinov E.S., Sharipov Sh. Determination of Allowable Damage Factor of Antiseismic Structures. Vestnik of Tomsk state university of architecture and building. 2016;(2):117-129. (In Russ.)
Views:
1159
Email this article 