The influence of classicism on urban planning in West Siberia
https://doi.org/10.31675/1607-1859-2021-23-3-81-97
Abstract
The of direction and style terms are of great importance in architecture and art history. The same names may have sometimes a completely different meaning. Classicism as one of the main trends in world architecture and art is now quite freely interpreted by different authors, which results in inaccurate definitions of architectural style of an object and the time of its construction. All this creates certain difficulties in studying not only historical buildings, but also their restoration or reconstruction.
The article raises several questions related to the direction style. The first is the origins of the style that spread throughout Europe and Russia since the mid of the 17th century and continues today. Both classicism and its architectural styles require clarification and understanding. The second issue concerns the architecture and development of Siberian cities. The third question describes the influence of classicism on urban planning in West Siberia.
About the Authors
A. P. GerasimovRussian Federation
Aleksandr P. Gerasimov, PhD, A/Professor
2, Solyanaya Sq., 634003, Tomsk, Russia
M. I. Korzh
Russian Federation
Mikhail I. Korzh, Student
2, Solyanaya Sq., 634003, Tomsk, Russia
References
1. Koh V. Enciklopediya arhitekturnyh stilej [Encyclopedia of architecture]. Moscow, 2008. 538 p. (rus)
2. Lisovskij V.G. Osobennosti russkoj arhitektury konca XIX – nachala XX v. [Russian architecture late in the 19th and early 20th centuries]. Leningrad, 1979. 39 p. (rus)
3. Pilyavskij V.I., Tic A.A., Ushakov Yu.S. Istoriya russkoj arhitektury [History of Russian architecture]. Moscow: Arhitektura-S, 2003. 511 p. (rus)
4. Gerasimov A.P. Istoricheskie koncepcii hudozhestvennyh stilej v iskusstve [Historical concepts of architectural styles]. In: Sbornik nauchnyh trudov po materialam X Vserossijskoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii (Proc. 10th All-Russ. Sci. Conf.). Tomsk: V-Spektr, 2014. 191 p. (rus)
5. Ozhegov S.S. Tipovoe i povtornoe stroitel'stvo v Rossii v XVIII‒XIX vekah [Standard construction and re-construction in Russia in the 18–19th centuries]. Moscow: Stroiizdat, 1987. 51 p. (rus)
6. Trekhsotletie doma Romanovyh. 1613‒1913 [Tercentenary of the House of Romanov 1613–1913]. Moscow: Sovremennik, 1999. 238 p. (rus)
7. Shcheglov I.V. Hronologicheskij perechen' vazhnejshih dannyh iz istorii Sibiri [A chronological list of the most important data from the history of Siberia, 1032‒1882]. Surgut: Severnyj dom, 1993. 463 p. (rus)
8. Sibirskaya Sovetskaya enciklopediya. [Siberian Soviet Encyclopedia], vol. 1, Novosibirsk, 1929. 524 p. (rus)
9. Balandin S.N. K istorii nachal'nogo formirovaniya arhitekturnogo kompleksa v gorodah Sibiri (konec XVII ‒ pervaya polovina XIX v.) [History of architecture formation in Siberian cities (late 17th and 19th centuries)]. In: Problemy istorii mestnogo upravleniya Sibiri XVII‒XX vekov. Materialy Regional'noj nauchnoj konferencii (Proc. Sci. Conf. ‘The History of Local Government in Siberia in the 17–20th centuries’). Novosibirsk, 1997. P. 5. (rus)
10. Skubnevskij V.A. Barnaul. Sibirskaya starina. 1993. No. 4. Pp. 8‒10. (rus)
11. Stepanskaya T.M. Arhitektura Altaya XVIII–XX vekov [Altai architecture in the 18–20th centuries]. Barnaul, 2006. 300 p. (rus)
12. Zalesov V.G. Arhitektory Tomska (XIX – nachalo XX veka) [Architects of Tomsk (19–20th centuries)]. Tomsk: TSUAB, 2004. 170 p. (rus)
13. Adrianov A.V. Tomskaya starina [Old Tomsk]. Tomsk, 1912. P. 7. (rus)
14. Popov O.A. Tomsk. Moscow: Gosstroiizdat, 1959. 135 p. (rus)
Review
For citations:
Gerasimov A.P., Korzh M.I. The influence of classicism on urban planning in West Siberia. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo arkhitekturno-stroitel'nogo universiteta. JOURNAL of Construction and Architecture. 2021;23(3):81-97. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31675/1607-1859-2021-23-3-81-97