ARCHITECTURAL EXEMPLIFICATION OF SOCIAL SPACE FOR DIFFERENT AGE GROUPS ON SOCIAL WELFARE

Purpose: The aim of this work is a study of the existing structure of social buildings in the Russian Federation and determination of the main directions of social space development for several generations on social welfare. A number of social problems is discussed as well as the improvement of living conditions of poor people on social welfare due to modernization of the existing social building typology. A new structure of social building development is proposed for several generations on social welfare.

Design/methodology/approach: The development of the social space structure for several generations is based on the data collection. Theoretical and practical studies include the existing experience of social buildings formation for younger and older generations as well as the experience of creating living environment for several generations in common. Apart from the analysis of the existing experience, a socio-economic analysis is conducted, which will determine further demands for investigations of the issue.

Research findings: It is shown that the problem of interest is underexplored, especially in the Russian Federation. However, the research findings in the field and related fields demonstrate the suppositions of the social space exemplification for several generations on social welfare. The problem of lonely people on social welfare, a lack of unity and understanding between people are the most important problems in the modern society. Thus, from the architectural viewpoint, it is crucial to build a social space for communication and interaction of people in the Russian Federation.

Practical implications: The research results will assist in the formation of a new type of social buildings which will be further designed and constructed in the cities of Russia. The structure of social buildings will consist of subtypes depending on the needs discovered. The needs of people who live in a specified area will contribute to the formation of the functional structure. In this lies the potential to create the structure which will lead to the implementation of certain stages in the social buildings construction.

Originality/value: It is possible to determine and rationalize basic principles of social space exemplification for several generations. The proposed strategy can be used to create a social space for several generations in cities of Russia. However, the process will be unique for every single area. The basic steps of the social space development are shown for several generations. The detailed analysis will allow using these steps to solve the problems posed. As there is a variety of factors in the social buildings formation which influence the existing stages, it is essential to study them. This will lead to eliciting some stages and modernization, or using just one of the stages, according to a structural scheme of a certain area. Finally, this research is a tool for further strategy development. The research results will help lonely people to find a family and, secondly, become meaningful members of the society. Moreover, it will provide them with comfortable accommodation.

1. Belicheva S.A. Organizatsiya i soderzhanie psikhosotsial'noi raboty v uchrezhdeniyakh sotsial'nogo obsluzhivaniya detei i molodezhi. [Organization and content of psychosocial work in institutions of social services for children and youth]. Moscow, 2002. (rus)

2. Zhukova V.I. (Ed). Opyt i problem zhizneustroistva detei-sirot i detei, ostavshikhsya bez popechitel'stva, v sovremennykh usloviyakh [Experience and problems of living arrangement of orphans and children left without care in modern conditions]. Moscow: RGSU, 2009. (rus)

3. Grishkina A.S., Dekterev S.A. Problemy organizatsii zhil'ya dlya pozhilykh lyudei v sovremennykh usloviyakh [Problems of housing organization for elderly people in modern conditions]. Available: http://archvuz.ru/2007_22/25 (accessed January 13, 2018). (ru s)

4. Kuracheva L.G., Yur'eva L.A. Adaptatsiya k domu-internatu prestarelykh i invalidov [Adaptation to the nursing home]. Available: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=25199837 (accessed Jan uary 13, 2018). (rus)

5. Kudinova E.A., Sinel'nikova M.V. Volonterstvo kak element sotsial'noi podderzhki vospitannikov detskikh domov i internatov [Volunteering as an element of social support for pupils of orphanages and boarding schools]. Available: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=25428335 (accessed January 13, 2018). (rus)

6. Potienko N.D. Deti-siroty v usloviyakh sovremennogo rossiiskogo obshchestva. Puti resheniya problem prozhivaniya [Orphaned children in modern conditions of the Russian society. Ways to solve the problem of living]. Available: https://elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_22472398_99432504.pdf (accessed April 19, 2018). (rus)

7. Potienko N.D. Arkhitektura spetsializirovannykh zdanii dlya detei-sirot [Architecture of specialized buildings for orphans]. Available: https://elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_22698268_12699563.pdf (accessed April 19, 2018). (rus)

8. Semenchenko E.I. Opyt arkhitekturnogo formirovaniya sovremennoi sredy zhiznedeyatel'nosti dlya neskol'kikh pokolenii lyudei, ostavshikhsya na sotsial'nom popechenii. In: Aktual'nye problemyi perspektivy razvitiya stroitel'stva, teplogazosnabzheniya i energoobespecheniya: Materialy VII ochnoi Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii (Proc. 7th AllRuss. Sci. Conf. „Relevant Problems of Construction, Ecology and Energy-Saving), F.K. Abdrazakova, Ed. Saratov: Saratovskii GAU, 2018. Pp. 251–256. (rus)

9. Ying Xu. New concept of aging care architecture landscape design based on sustainable deve lopment. American Institute of Physics, 2017.

10. Nettleton S., Buse Ch., Martin D. Envisioning bodies and architectures of care: Reflections on competition designs for older people. Journal of Aging Studies. 2018. Pp. 54–62.

11. Nettleton S., Buse Ch., Martin D. Conceptualising „materialities of care‟: making visible mu ndane material culture in health and social care contexts. Sociology of Health & Illness. 2018. Pp. 243–255.

12. Nettleton S., Buse Ch., Martin D. 'Essentially it‟s just a lot of bedrooms': architectural design, prescribed personalisation and the construction of care homes for later life. Sociology of Health & Illness. 2018. Pp. 1156–1171.

13. Nord C. Resident-centred care and architecture of two different types of caring residences: a comparative study. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being. 2018.

14. Eijkelenboom A., Verbeek H., Felix E., Hoof J. van. Architectural factors influencing the sense of home in nursing homes: An operationalization for practice. In: Frontiers of Architectural Research. 2017. Pp. 112–122.

15. Kripnerova K. In: Proc. 6th Sci. Conf. „Architectural Design as a Tool of Social Integration‟, 2016. Pp. 101–106.

16. Jing Fan, Dayi Bian, Zhi Zheng, Linda Beuscher, Paul A. Newhouse, Lorraine C. Mion, Nila njan Sarkar. A robotic coach architecture for elder care (ROCARE) based on multi-user engagement models. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering. 2017. Pp. 1153–1163.