COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF CONCEPTS OF CREATING SAFE BUILT ENVIRONMENT
Abstract
The paper presents the description of concepts and programs, regions, residential areas and houses designed or reconstructed using these concepts. The role of these concepts is shown in the context of modern requirements for the architectural environment, interaction between people and this environment, and its signals that have an effect on actions of would-be criminals. The comparative analysis is conducted for main foreign tendencies of design and rehabilitation of the built environment protected from criminals. International goals, objectives, methods, and principles are compared herein. Additionally shown are problems connected with their practical implementation.
About the Authors
EKATERINA R. Polianzeva
Ural State Academy of Architecture and Arts
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
YULIA S. Yankovskaya
Ural State Academy of Architecture and Arts
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Jacobs J. The Death and Life of Great American Cities. Moscow : Novoe izdatel'stvo, 2011. 460 p. (transl. from Engl.)
2. Lynch K. The image of the City. Moscow : Stroyizdat, 1982. Pp. 50–53. (transl. from Engl.)
3. Atlas R.L. The sustainability of CPTED: Less magic more science! The CPTED Journal. 1 (1), 2002. Pp. 3–14.
4. Atlas R.L. 21st Century security and CPTED: Designing for critical infrastructure protection and crime prevention. Los-Angeles: CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Ltd, 2008. Pp. 81–84.
5. Brantingham P.J., Brantingham L.P. Environmental criminology. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press, 1981. 282 p.
6. Grönlund В. On CPTED – Crime prevention through urban design. Seminar 'Towards the Humane City for the 21st century'. Stockholm, 2000. Pp. 2–3.
7. Clarke R.V. Situational crime prevention: successful case studies. Albany, NY: Harrow and Heston, 1992. 43 p.
8. Crow T.D. Crime prevention through environmental design. Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann, 1991. Pp. 22–27.
9. Duany A., Plater-Zyberk E. The thirteen points of traditional neighborhood development. FFF Newsletter, 1996. Pp. 2–3.
10. Katz P. The new urbanism: toward an architecture of community. New York : McGraw-Hill, 1994. 245 p.
11. Newman O. Defensible space: crime prevention through urban. New York : Macmillan, 1972. 264 p.
12. O’Toole R., Town S. Crime-friendly neighborhoods: how "new urbanist" planners sacrifice safety in the name of "openness" and "accessibility". February, 2005. Available at : http://reason.com/archives/2005/02/01/crime-friendly-neighborhoods. Last visited on Sept. 2006.
13. Reijnhoudt P. Crime opportunity profiling of streets. Summary of presentation in Munster, Germany, September 2004. Pp. 105–109.
14. United Nations Human Settlements Programme (UN-Habitat). The state of the world’s cities: globalization and urban culture, 2004. Pр. 170–183.
15. Wilson J., Kelling G. Broken windows. The Atlantic Monthly. March 1982. Available at : http://www.manhattan-institute.org/pdf/_atlantic_monthly-broken_windows.pdf. Last visited on May 2013.
Review
For citations:
Polianzeva E.R., Yankovskaya Yu.S. COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF CONCEPTS OF CREATING SAFE BUILT ENVIRONMENT. Vestnik of Tomsk state university of architecture and building. 2015;(3):65-78. (In Russ.)
Views:
492
Email this article 