Towards Alternativeness in Bridge Architecture
Abstract
About the Authors
Vladimir M. KartopoltsevRussian Federation
Svetlana A. Kukharenko
Russian Federation
Kristina V. Kiseleva
Russian Federation
References
1. Gibshman N.E, Popov V.I. Proektirovanie transportnyh sooruzhenii [Design of transport facilities]. Moscow: Transport Publ., 1988. 447 p. (rus)
2. Momchilov M. Contemporary decisions of pedestrian bridges. Proc. 65th Anniv. Int. Conf., VSU’2003. Sofia, Bulgaria, 2003. V. I. P. 53–58.
3. Baranovskii V.M. Mosty Peterburga [Bridges of St.-Petersburg]. St.-Petersburg: P-2 Publ., 2010. 181 p. (rus)
4. Kartopoltsev V.M., Hvorova M.A. Estimation criteria of architectural high positive features of automobile and urban bridges. Proc. 10th Int. Sci. Conf., VSU’2010. Sofia, Bulgaria, 2010. V. 2. Pp. 86–91.
5. Ovchinnikov I.G., Ovchinnikov I.I., Karakhanyan A.B. Peshehodnye mosty sovremennosti: tendentsii proektirovaniya. Chast' 3. Interesnye reshenija peshehodnyh i velosipednyh mostov [Pedestrian bridges of today: design trends. Pt 3. Interesting solutions on pedestrian and bicycle bridges]. Naukovedenie. 2015. V. 7. No 3. Available at: http://naukovedenie.ru/ PDF/81TVN215. pdf (rus)
Review
For citations:
Kartopoltsev V.M., Kukharenko S.A., Kiseleva K.V. Towards Alternativeness in Bridge Architecture. Vestnik of Tomsk state university of architecture and building. 2017;(2):192-203. (In Russ.)