Formal and Composition Stability of Ekaterinburg Historical Center
https://doi.org/10.31675/1607-1859-2024-26-5-53-70
EDN: DPEMRV
- Р Р‡.МессенРТвЂВВВВВВВВжер
- РћРТвЂВВВВВВВВнокласснРСвЂВВВВВВВВРєРСвЂВВВВВВВВ
- LiveJournal
- Telegram
- ВКонтакте
- РЎРєРѕРїРСвЂВВВВВВВВровать ссылку
Full Text:
Abstract
Preserving the city structural elements of architectural and urban planning culture, is currently the most important task. It is necessary to achieve a sustainable development, preserve historical heritage and cultivate a careful attitude towards the culture of the Russian Federation. It is important to take into account the morphological integrity of the historically developed urban environment, which is considered through the prism of formal compositional stability. The article presents the analysis of the architectural and urban development to identify the most stable structural elements of Yekaterinburg. Systematic and historical approaches are the methodology of the study, which allows to consistently analyze the extensive material using urban planning and retrospective analysis.
The article proposes periodic formation and development of the structural elements of the historical center from the beginning of the city formation to the present, including six periods: pre-reform, post-reform, pre-war period, war and post-war period, developed socialism and perestroika, postSoviet period. Structural elements of the historical center are reconstructed, reflecting the evolution of the formal and composition aspect of the city in each period of its historical development. Lost and most stable structural elements of the city are identified and can be protected as heritage.
About the Author
A. V. Leizerova
Ural Federal University named after the First President of Russia B. N. Yeltsin
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Arina V. Leizerova, Senior Lecturer
17, Mira Str., 620002, Ekaterinburg
References
1. Leizerova A.V. Architectural and Urban Planning Typology of Cultural and Historical Islands. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo arkhitekturno-stroitel'nogo universiteta - Journal of Construction and Architecture. 2020; 22 (5): 65-81. (In Russian)
2. Lisitsyna A.V. Historical and Architectural Environment of Small and Medium-Sized Cities of the Nizhny Novgorod Volga Region. DSc Thesis. Nizhny Novgorod, 2020. 570 p. (In Russian)
3. Grozovskaya S. Historical Settlement: Why don’t All Cities Approve Protection Documents? Gorodskie issledovaniya i praktiki. 2022; 7 (3): 65-79. (In Russian)
4. Matveev B.M. Deconstruction of Architectural Heritage. Saint-Petersburg: Politekhnika-service, 2012; 423 p. (In Russian)
5. Goloborodsky M.V., Tokmeninova L.I., Sanok S.I. Master Plan History of Yekaterinburg in 1723-2003. Ekaterinburg: TATLIN, 2013. 40 p. (In Russian)
6. Goloborodsky M.V. Formation and Development of Novo-Tikhvin Monastery Composition. Akademicheskij vestnik UralNII proekt RAASN. 2010; (4): 67-72. (In Russian)
7. Beletskaya E.A., Krasheninnikova N.L. et al. “Exemplary” Projects in Residential Development of Russian Cities in the 18-19th Centuries. Moscow, 1961. 206 p. (In Russian)
8. Kholodova L.P. Architecture of Industrial Cities of the Urals in 19th and Early 20th Centuries. DSc Thesis. Ekaterinburg, 1994. 216 p. (In Russian)
9. Kirichenko E.I. Russian Architecture in 1830-1910. Moscow: Iskusstvo, 1978. 400 p. (In Russian)
10. Orelskaya O.V. Nizhny Novgorod Architecture of the 20th Century as Reflection of Russian and Foreign Architecture. DSc Abstract. Nizhny Novgorod, 2009. 48 p. (In Russian)
11. Kirichenko E.I. (Ed.) Urban Planning in Russia in the Mid-19th and Early 20th Centuries. Research Institute of Theory of Architecture and Urban Development Moscow: ProgressTraditsiya, 2001. 340 p. (In Russian)
12. Mikhailova L.G., Goloborodsky M.V. Modern Wooden Architecture in the Urals. Akademicheskij vestnik UralNII proekt RAASN. 2019; 4; 61-66. (In Russian)
13. Bubnov Yu.N. Architecture of Nizhny Novgorod in the Mid-19th and Early 20th Centuries. Gorky: Volgo-Vyatskoe Izd., 1991. 176 p. (In Russian)
14. Pilyavsky V.I., Tits A.A., Ushakov Yu.S. History of Russian Architecture. Moscow: Arkhitektura-S, 2003. 511 p. (In Russian)
15. Reclus E. Earth and People. Saint-Petersburg: Obshchestvennaya pol'za, 1899. 1434 p. (Russian translation)
16. Alferov N.S., Belyankin G.I., Kozlov A.G., Korotkovsky A.E. Sverdlovsk (Construction and Architecture). Moscow: Stroyizdat, 1980. 160 p. (In Russian)
17. Meerovich M.G. Urban Development Policy in the USSR (1917-1929). From Garden City to Departmental Industrial Community. Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 2017. 352 p. (In Russian)
18. Tokmeninova L.I. Architecture of Sverdlovsk Constructivism. In: New Life of Monuments of Constructivist Architecture. Novosibirsk, 2015. Pp. 94-102. (In Russian)
19. Tokmeninova L.I. Architecture of Yekaterinburg: Constructivism. Ekaterinburg: Al'yans, 2014. 176 p. (In Russian)
20. Stasyuk K.V. Stylistic Diversity in the Work by Moses Reischer: From Constructivism to Neoclassicism, from Variations of Neo-Russian Style to Architecture of “Khrushchev Minimalism” Teoriya i istoriya iskusstva. 2019; (1): 51-64. (In Russian)
21. Iovleva E.V. Neoclassicism in Sverdlovsk Architecture (1930-1950). PhD Thesis. Ekaterinburg: Ural State Architectural and Art Academy, 2004. 153 p. (In Russian)
22. Fesenko D. Belated Blossoming. About Postmodernism in Soviet Architecture. Available: http://www.intelros.ru/subject/figures/teoriy_arh_processa/6774-zapozdalyj-rascvet-o-postmodernizme-v-sovetskoj-arxitekture.html (In Russian)
Review
For citations:
Leizerova A.V. Formal and Composition Stability of Ekaterinburg Historical Center. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo arkhitekturno-stroitel'nogo universiteta. JOURNAL of Construction and Architecture. 2024;26(5):53-70. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31675/1607-1859-2024-26-5-53-70. EDN: DPEMRV
Views:
93
ISSN 1607-1859 (Print)
ISSN 2310-0044 (Online)
ISSN 2310-0044 (Online)
Email this article 