Convenient living environment in standard buildings built in the 1950–80s

The convenient living environment has to be currently improved be means of ergonomic recommendations for further redevelopment of buildings in conditions associated with their moral and physical deterioration in the 20th century. The ergonometric analysis is based a widespread model of residential buildings built in the 1950-80s throughout  the country.

Purpose: The analysis of planning structures of standard buildings according to the transit movement in the apartment, zoning and mutual arrangement of ergonomic premises.

Methodology/approach: Terminological and theoretical comparative analyses and modeling; calculation of the coefficient of non-straightness in the planning structure of such buildings; evaluation of convenience of planning structures according to the transit movement, zoning and mutual arrangement of premises.

Research findings: The econometric analysis of two types of movement in the apartment. Functional and planning zoning and relative location of premises are selected and schematically shown. Coefficients of non-straightness are calculated. Evaluation of convenience according to the transit movement, zoning and mutual arrangement of premises.

Originality: The ergonometric analysis of standard residential buildings conducted for the shortest distances and premise location relative to each other.

1. Ryabova M.G. Evolution of multifunctional residential building complex as an urban planning unit. Stroitel'stvo i tekhnogennaya bezopasnost'. 2014; (51): 28-34. (In Russian).

2. Suvorov M. What is the service life of building, what does it depend on? How to determine the life of a panel or other house? Legal Center. 2020. Available: https://pravovoi.center/zpp/srok-sluzhby/zhiloj-konstruktsii.html (accessed April 26, 2022). (In Russian).

3. Myl'nikov I.A. Problems of five-storey building reconstruction. Chelyabinsk, 2018. 86 p. (In Russian).

4. Osipov Yu.K., Matekhina O.V. Comfort and safety of living environment. Vestnik Sibirskogo gosudarstvennogo industrial'nogo universiteta. 2014; (4): 43-47. (In Russian).

5. Sadykova Zh.M., Murzagalieva A.B. Architecture of residential environment. Aktual'nye issledovaniya v sovremennom mire. 2018; 41 (9-1): 23-34. (In Russian).

6. Mihajlov S.M. Ergonomics of space. Dizain-Revyu. 2008; (34): 74-79. (In Russian).

7. GOSINKOR, Unified architectural and construction systems of attic floors for superstructure of reconstructed houses. Moscow: Gosstroi, 1998. 154 p. (In Russian).

8. Smirnov A.B. Ergonomics. Saint-Petersburg: Peter the Great Polytechnic University, 2016. 125 p. (In Russian).

9. Kolosova I.I. Ergonomics of minimal spaces. Tomsk State University of Architecture and Building. 2011; (4): 16. (In Russian).

10. Blog Ergonomics, What is Ergonomics? Dohrman consulting Australia’s leading safety and ergonomics experts. 2014. Available: www.ergonomics.com.au/what-is-ergonomics/ (accessed April 26, 2022).

11. Mariya Hose Roldan. What is ergonomics: characteristics and types. Available: www.recurso-sdeautoayuda.com/ru/эргономика (accessed April 26, 2022). (In Russian).

12. Krivonosov A.V. Ensuring home comfort via space-planning solution. E-SCIO. 2019; (4): 529-532. (In Russian).

13. Zanina I.A., Sokolovskaya O.V., Tryapichkin S.A. Ergonomics and psychophysiological foundations of occupational safety. Shakhty, 2013. 119 p. (In Russian).

14. Korotkova S.G. Ergonomic approach in architectural design. Izvestiya KGASU. 2015; 34 (4): 113-119. (rus)

15. Proshunina K.A., Ovcherenko I.A. Theoretical interrelation of ergonomic principles and conceptual architecture of living environment. Inzhenerno-stroitel'nyi vestnik Prikaspiya. 2018; (4): 12-23. (In Russian).

16. Viviane Folcher, Khaldoun Zreik, Samia Ben Rajeb, Pierre Leclercq. Innovative learning for collaborative design in ergonomics. In: Proc. 31st eCAADe Conf., Netherlands, 2013. 9 p.

17. Zokolej S.V. Architectural design, operation of objects, their connection with the environment. Moscow: Stroyizdat, 1984. 670 p. (Russian translation).

18. Shilin V.V. Architecture and psychology. Nizhny Novgorod, 2011. 66 p. (In Russian).

19. Egopov M.S. Floor area per person in the apartment. Etazhi. Available: https://j.etagi.com/ps/norma-ploshchadi-na-1-cheloveka-v-kvartire/#:~:text=Norm%20references%20to%20member%20zakon,2021%20year%20displayed%20b%20tablice (accessed April 26, 2022). (In Russian).

20. Smirnova A. Ergonomics of layouts: How to choose a comfortable accommodation. Moscow. 2020. Available: https://avaho.ru/articles/remont/ergonomika-planirovok-kak-vybrat-udobnoe-zhile.html (accessed April 26, 2022). (In Russian).

21. Methodological guidelines for the course project implementation "Medium-rise residential building". Moscow: MARCHI, 2013. 40 p. (In Russian).

22. Krasnov R.K. Problems of small-sized housing and ways to solve them. Mezhdunarodnyi zhurnal gumanitarnykh i estestvennykh nauk. 2018; (12-2): 170-173. (In Russian).