Building reliability specification by deformation based on aesthetic and psychological requirements
https://doi.org/10.31675/1607-1859-2022-24-2-87-94
Abstract
The structural analysis is currently based on the limit state method. Meeting the strength, rigidity, crack resistance requirements ensures the required structural reliability. But the limit state method does not allow to determine the numerical value of reliability. This can be done only by applying probabilistic methods that are greatly developed in the late 20th century.
Their practical use is hindered by a number of factors, among which is the lack of reasonable values of the reliability specification. The reliability specification of structures is determined by their normal operation including deformation and vibrations causing certain difficulties. Structural failures in this case have both economic and social consequences. There are very few works considering this problem. This is most likely due to the fact that the calculation of suitability for normal operation plays a secondary role. Violation of serviceability conditions does not lead to large economic, environmental and social consequences. But it is still necessary to consider the reliability specification in this area. This article determines the reliability specification by structure deformations based on aesthetic and psychological requirements. The proposed method for determining the reliability specification is based on deflection, which, in turn, depend on the effective load and structural rigidity.
About the Author
E. P. GerasimovRussian Federation
Evgeniy P. Gerasimov - PhD, A/Professor.
38, Krasnyi Ave., 630099, Novosibirsk
References
1. Shpete G. Nadezhnost' nesushchikh stroitel'nykh konstruktsii [Reliability of load-bearing structures]. Moscow: Stroiizdat, 1994. 288 p. (rus)
2. Tal' K.E. Voprosy nadezhnosti zhelezobetonnykh sooruzhenii za rubezhom [Reliability of reinforced concrete structures abroad]. Beton i zhelezobeton. 1973. No. 11. Pp. 42–43. (rus)
3. Gromatskii V.A. Otsenka nadezhnosti zhelezobetonnykh izgibaemykh elementov po deformatsiyam [Reliability assessment of reinforced concrete bending elements by deformations]. Stroitel'naya mekhanika i raschet sooruzhenii. 2007. No. 2. Pp. 35–40. (rus)
4. Tamarzyan A.G. K otsenke opredeleniya urovnya riska ChS po osnovnym priznakam ego proyavleniya na sooruzhenie [Assessing the emergency risk level by the main signs]. Beton i zhelezobeton. 2001. No. 5. Pp. 8–10. (rus)
5. Raizer V.D. Analiz nadezhnosti konstruktsii pri iznose nesushchikh elementov [Strength analysis of wear and tear of load-bearing elements]. Stroitel'naya mekhanika i raschet sooruzhenii. 2013. No. 6. Pp. 16–20. (rus)
6. Peremul'ter A.V. Izbrannye problemy nadezhnosti i bezopasnosti stroitel'nykh konstruktsii [Selected problems of reliability and safety of buildings]. Moscow: ASV, 2007. 256 p. (rus)
7. Lychev A.S. Nadezhnost' stroitel'nykh konstruktsii [Structural reliability]. Moscow: ASV, 2008. 184 p. (rus)
8. Raizer V.D. Raschet i normirovanie nadezhnosti stroitelnih konstrukciy [Structural analysis and reliability specification ]. Moscow: Stroyizdat, 1995. 352 p. (rus)
9. Raizer V.D. Optimizazia nadezhnosti konstrukziy I bezopasnost cheloveka [Optimisation of structural reliability and human safety]. Stroitel'naya mekhanika i raschet sooruzhenii. 2009. No. 6. Pp. 54–58. (rus)
10. Rzhanitsyn A.R. Teoriya rascheta stroitel'nykh konstruktsii na nadezhnost' [The theory of structural reliability]. Moscow: Stroiizdat, 1978. 239 p. (rus)
Review
For citations:
Gerasimov E.P. Building reliability specification by deformation based on aesthetic and psychological requirements. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo arkhitekturno-stroitel'nogo universiteta. JOURNAL of Construction and Architecture. 2022;24(2):87-94. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31675/1607-1859-2022-24-2-87-94