CHANGES IN SOVIET ARCHITECTURAL STYLES IN THE 1930s
https://doi.org/10.31675/1607-1859-2019-21-4-125-137
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of the paper is to study the history of Soviet architecture, associated with changes in its stylistic orientation, when instead of the previously dominant constructivist forms other forms began to prevail, namely Art Deco, neoclassicism and eclecticism. The paper explores the processes in architecture of that time, identifies the main prerequisites for the formation of that architectural style.
Methodology/approach: The methodological approach includes a comparative analysis of scientific publications and buildings of Soviet architecture of the 1930s. A comprehensive study is conducted to identify the prerequisites, processes and features of the architecture of this period.
Research findings: The main results concern the period under study accompanied by both evolutionary and cardinal changes in architecture associated with the general architectural policy of the government and the creativity of architects. All this determines the peculiarities of the controversial, transitional style of Soviet architecture. The analysis of the controversial architectural style considers the individual genesis. This style is formed under specific conditions and has its own history. Architectural competitions of the 1930s demonstrate the stylistic diversity of architecture and the evolutionary transition from constructivism to Soviet neoclassicism observed in the works of those architects who previously designed the style of constructivism. The term post-constructivism means both a purely chronological concept, that is a period in the history of architecture following the epoch of constructivism and the specific architectural and stylistic phenomenon which still combines constructivism and elements of the subsequent style. A search for individual architects determines the style of the 1930s. In this regard, the term post constructivism best reflects the diversity of architecture of that time, taking into account the historical era and national identity, and the use of elements typical to Art Deco, Neo-Renaissance, or Classicism.
Practical implications: The research results can be used to further studying the architecture of this period as well as in the preparation of courses on the history of Soviet architecture of the 1930s. This study makes it possible to realize historical, artistic and cultural value of this style, thereby preserving it in the future.
Originality/value: The history of the architecture of that period is still not well understood and is of particular interest for researchers. This study considers both well-known and insufficiently studied buildings of Soviet architecture of the 1930s, compares the obtained facts and opinions of other authors‟. As a result, the paper combines, compares and analyzes interesting information on this topic and investigates concrete facts. Also, a comparison is given to the architecture of the studied and previous periods.
About the Author
V. M. MzhelskyRussian Federation
Victor M. Mzhelsky - PhD, A/Professor
113, Leningradskaya Str., 630008, Novosibirsk
References
1. Bylinkin N.P., Kalmykova V.N., Ryabushin A.V. Istoriya sovetskoy arkhitektury (1917–1954) [History of Soviet Architecture (1917–1954)], 2nd ed. Moscow: Stroiizdat, 1985. 256 p. (rus).
2. Davidich T.F. Osobennosti stilistiki arkhitektury Khar'kova 1910-1950-kh godov [Stylistics architecture of Kharkov in the 1910–1950s]. Academia. Arkhitektura i stroitel'stvo. 2015. No. 1. Pp. 49–56. Available: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/osobennosti-stilistiki-arhitekturyharkova-1910-1950-h-godov (rus)
3. Barkhin A.D. Rebristyy stil' vysotnykh zdaniy i neoarkhaizm v arkhitekture 1920–1930-kh [The ribbed style of high-rise buildings and neo-anarchism in the architecture of the 1920 – 1930s]. Academia. Arkhitektura i stroitel'stvo. 2016. No. 3. Pp. 56–65. Available: https://archi.ru/russia/72527/rebristyi-stil-vysotnykh-zdanii-i-neoarkhaizm-v-arkhitekture-1920-1930-kh (rus).
4. Ikonnikov A.V. Arkhitektura XX veka. Utopii i real'nost' [Architecture of the 20th century. Utopias and reality]. Moscow: Progress-Tradition, 2001. V. 1. 656 p. (rus)
5. Khmelnitsky D.S. Arkhitektura Stalina: psikhologiya i stil' [Architecture of Stalin: Psychology and style]. Moscow: Progress-Tradition, 2007. 376 p. (rus)
6. Baranov N.V. (Ed.) Vseobshchaya istoriya arkhitektury v 12 tomakh [The general history of architecture], in 12 vol. Moscow: Stroiizdat, 1975. V. 12. 756 p. (rus)
7. Khan-Magomedov S.O. Khrushchevskiy utilitarizm: plyusy i minusy [Khrushchevsky utilitarianism: pros and cons]. Available: https://www.niitiag.ru/pub/pub_cat/han_magomedov_hrushhevskij_utilitarizm_pljusy_i_minusy (rus)
8. Pamyatniki arkhitektury Novosibirskoy oblasti. Kn. 1: g. Novosibirsk [Monuments of architecture of the Novosibirsk region. Book 1: The city of Novosibirsk], 3rd ed. Novosibirsk: SPC, 2011. 278 p. (rus)
9. Nevzgodin I.V. Arkhitektura Novosibirska [Architecture of Novosibirsk]. Novosibirsk, 2005. 204 p. (rus)
10. Voinov A.A. Arkhitektura Belorussii [Architecture of Belarus]. Minsk: Vysheishaya shkola, 1975. 216 p. (rus)
Review
For citations:
Mzhelsky V.M. CHANGES IN SOVIET ARCHITECTURAL STYLES IN THE 1930s. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo arkhitekturno-stroitel'nogo universiteta. JOURNAL of Construction and Architecture. 2019;21(4):125-137. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31675/1607-1859-2019-21-4-125-137