Ratio between Open and Enclosed Space in Co-Working Space
https://doi.org/10.31675/1607-1859-2025-27-1-110-117
EDN: GYQTSF
Abstract
Co-working space combines open and enclosed spaces in which various activities of residents are carried out. Open and enclosed co-workings influence the formation of the environment and conditions for a certain activity (each activity has its own space). Today, the ratio between open and enclosed spaces is relevant in terms of spatial solutions (open and enclosed spaces) and affect the efficiency of the economic activity of people. Based on the analysis of open and enclosed co-working spaces, their functional purpose, operation and spatial planning solutions, this paper studies the interaction and intersection of spatial structures of open and enclosed spaces. The study includes planning components of various co-working spaces: integrity, mutual arrangement, functional connections, dominance. The analysis of these components is the basis of systematization of possible connections between open and enclosed spaces. Functional-spatial structures of open and enclosed co-workings are presented together with transitional stages between them.
Purpose: The aim of the work is to systematize the types of connections of open and closed spaces with each other.
Research findings: Functional-spatial structures are proposed for co-working spaces from open to closed type with transitional stages between them.
About the Author
S. I. Semenov
Nizhny Novgorod State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Svyatoslav I. Semenov, Research Assistant,
65, Ilyinskaya Str., 603000, Nizhniy Novgorod.
References
1. Zelenov L.A. Collected Works, in 4 vol. Vol. 3. Anthroponomy. Nizhny Novgorod, 2006. 244 p. ISBN 5-93530-179-2. (In Russian)
2. Spinuzzi C. Working Alone Together. Coworking as Emergent Collaborative Activity. Journal of Business and Technical Communication. 2012; 26 (4): 399–441. DOI: 10.1177/1050651912444070
3. Waters-Lynch J., Potts J., Butcher T., Dodson J., Hurley J. Coworking: A Transdisciplinary Overview. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2016; 1–58. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2712217
4. Spinuzzi C., Bodrozic Z., Scaratti G., Ivaldi S. Coworking is About Community: But What is “Community” in Coworking? Journal of Business and Technical Communication. 2018; 33 (2): 112–140. DOI: 10.1177/1050651918816357
5. Deskmag. Available: www.deskmag.com/en/ (accessed December 4, 2024).
6. Global Coworking Survey. Available: www.globalcoworkingsurvey.com/ (accessed December 4, 2024).
7. Deskmag coworking statistics. Available: https://coworkingstatistics.com/general-coworkingstatistics-free (accessed December 4, 2024).
8. Pricing at the old church school. Available: www.theoldchurchschool.co.uk/pricing/ (accessed December 4, 2024).
9. Mindspace. Meeting rooms. Available: https://partners.flexspace.ai/offerings/mindspace-meeting-rooms (accessed December 4, 2024).
10. Oceanis coworking. Available: https://oceanis-cowork.ru/ (accessed December 4, 2024).
11. Semenov S.I. History of Transformation of the Term Coworking. In: Proc. 14th All-Russ. Festival of Science, November 24–26. Nizhny Novgorod, 2024. Pp. 434–435. (In Russian)
12. Zinina S.M., Semenov S.I. Psychological Patterns of Communication in Coworking Space Design. In: Proc. 12th All-Russ. Festival of Science, October 18–19, Nizhny Novgorod, 2022. Pp. 544–548. (In Russian)
Review
For citations:
Semenov S.I. Ratio between Open and Enclosed Space in Co-Working Space. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo arkhitekturno-stroitel'nogo universiteta. JOURNAL of Construction and Architecture. 2025;27(1):110-117. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31675/1607-1859-2025-27-1-110-117. EDN: GYQTSF
Views:
84
Email this article 