Preview

Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo arkhitekturno-stroitel'nogo universiteta. JOURNAL of Construction and Architecture

Advanced search

Stress field evolution on rebar coupling connection at uniaxial tension

https://doi.org/10.31675/1607-1859-2024-26-2-194-203

EDN: SFQVOS

Abstract

Rebar coupling connections are widely used for joints, and it is necessary to get information about the stress field distribution on the coupling surface at uniaxial tension to characterize operation of such joints.
Purpose: The aim of the work is to study the stress-strain state of rebar connections under tension, full-scale junctions of the type A500 rods, and the deformation influence on the steel microstructure of grade С1020.
Methodology: Non-contact three-dimensional imaging system VIC-3D and digital image correlation and tracking for studying stress-strain state of rebar connection; transmission electron microscopy for studying the steel microstructure.
Research findings: Load-displacement curves are suggested for the valve coupling, and three deformation stages are identified: 1) elastic deformation of the coupling connection, 2) parabolic hardening, 3) preceding the coupling connection destruction. The analysis of the strain field distribution on the coupling connection shows that at any time, plastic strain localizes in certain zones of the sample. The stress field evolution on the coupling connection correlates with the indicated deformation stages. The compliance of the rebar joint made of seamless hot-deformed tube with an outer and inner diameters 51 and 32 mm, respectively, made of С1020 steel grade, induces 500 MPa stress in the normal section of rebar under the tensile axial load.
Value: It is shown that during uniaxial tension of 0 to 5 %, perlite fractures, which is accompanied by further polarization of the dislocation structure. The internal stress amplitude increases and at 5% tension, far-range stresses grow as compared with those induced forest dislocations. The main contribution to far-range stresses and their change at 5 % tension is made by the elastic component, that promotes to the microcrack formation.

About the Authors

A. M. Ustinov
Tomsk State University of Architecture and Building
Russian Federation

Artem M. Ustinov, PhD, A/Professor

2, Solyanaya Sq., 634003, Tomsk



A. A. Klopotov
Tomsk State University of Architecture and Building
Russian Federation

Anatoly A. Klopotov, DSc, Professor

2, Solyanaya Sq., 634003, Tomsk



A. S. Plyaskin
Tomsk State University of Architecture and Building
Russian Federation

Andrey S. Plyaskin, PhD, A/Professor

2, Solyanaya Sq., 634003, Tomsk



G. G. Volokitin
Tomsk State University of Architecture and Building
Russian Federation

Gennady G. Volokitin, DSc, Professor

2, Solyanaya Sq., 634003, Tomsk



References

1. Regulations on the use of mechanical rebar connections for reinforced concrete structures and nuclear power plants. (In Russian)

2. Marushchak P.O., Panin S.V., Student A.Z., Ovechkin B.B. Deformation destruction of heat-resistant steels. Tomsk: TPU, 2013. 236 p. (In Russian)

3. Alyokhin V.P. Physics of strength and plasticity of surface layers of materials. Moscow: Nauka, 1983. 280 p. (In Russian)

4. Razumovsky I.A. Development of optical methods of deformable body mechanics (review). Zavodskaya lab. Diagnostics of materials. 2008; 74 (10): 45−54. (In Russian)

5. Tretyakova T.V. VIC-3D software for digital image correlation for inelastic deformations. Vychislitel'naya mekhanika sploshnykh sred. 2014; 7 (2): 162−171. (In Russian)

6. Tretyakova T.V., Tretyakov M.P., Wildeman V.E. Measurement accuracy evaluated by video system for analyzing displacement and deformation fields. Vestnik PGTU. Mekhanika. 2011; (2): 92−100. (In Russian)

7. Ustinov A., Kopanitsa D., Potekaev A., Klopotov A. Distribution of local deformations on the near-surface layers and scale effects of low alloy steel specimens. AIP Conference Proceedings. 2015; 1683. 020233.

8. Kopanitsa D.G., Ustinov A.M., Potekaev A.I., Klopotov А.А., Kopanitsa G.D. Macro-carriers of plastic deformation of steel surface layers detected by digital image correlation. Advanced Materials in Technology and Construction. AIP Conf. Proc. 1698, 030014-1–030014-8.

9. Ivanova B.C. Synergetics. Strength and fracture of metal materials. Moscow: Nauka, 1992. 159 p. (In Russian)

10. Kozlov E.V., Popova N.A., Ignatenko L.N., Teplyakova L.A. Substructural and carbide transformations during plastic strain of tempered chromium-nickel martensitic steel. Izvestiya vuzov. Fizika. 1992; (12): 25−32. (In Russian)

11. Kozlov E.V., Popova N.A., Ignatenko L.N., Teplyakova L.A., Klopotov A.A. Structure and phase transformations during plastic strain of martensitic steel. Izvestiya vuzov. Fizika. 1994; (4): 52−60. (In Russian)

12. Kozlov E.V., Popova N.A., Ignatenko L.N., Teplyakova L.A., Klopotov A.A., Koneva N.A. Influence of substructure type on carbon redistribution in martensitic steel during plastic strain. Izvestiya vuzov. Fizika. 2002; (3):72−86. (In Russian)


Review

For citations:


Ustinov A.M., Klopotov A.A., Plyaskin A.S., Volokitin G.G. Stress field evolution on rebar coupling connection at uniaxial tension. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo arkhitekturno-stroitel'nogo universiteta. JOURNAL of Construction and Architecture. 2024;26(2):194-203. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31675/1607-1859-2024-26-2-194-203. EDN: SFQVOS

Views: 249


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1607-1859 (Print)
ISSN 2310-0044 (Online)