Development of automated monitoring for planned-high-altitude position control (Tomsk)
https://doi.org/10.31675/1607-1859-2023-25-6-139-151
EDN: XNNNTL
Abstract
GIS has built-in software and analytical modules that allow processing large data of design, as-built documentation, survey results and measurements during building operation as well as conducting a comprehensive analysis of monitoring results and predict the permafrost state, perform planning and monitoring of works.
Purpose: The paper examines the possibility of using in the survey process in assessment of natural frequencies and vibrations of sections of above-ground buildings using the proposed device to control its spatial position.
Practical implications: The data obtained can be used in monitoring the spatial position of buildings, based on analyzing vibrations data obtained from automated observation posts, which allows to estimate the displacement from the equilibrium position and vibrational frequency of extended objects with an error acceptable for practice and determine the critical state of the system.
About the Authors
Р. V. Burkov
Тоmsk State University of Architecture and Building; National Research Тоmsk Polytechnic University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Petr V. Burkov, DSc, Professor
30, Lenin Ave., 634050, Tomsk;
2, Solyanaya Sq., 634003
A. A. Marina
National Research Тоmsk Polytechnic University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Alena A. Marina, Research Assistant
30, Lenin Ave., 634050, Tomsk
References
1. Aleksandrov A.A., Larionov V.I., Gumerov R.A. Automated system for monitoring main oil pipelines in seismic areas. Vestnik MGTU im. N.E. Baumana. Ser. Mashinostroenie. 2014; 5 (98): 113–126. (In Russian)
2. Genicke A.A., Pobedinsky G.G. Global satellite determination systems locations and their application in geodesy. Moscow: Cartgeocenter, 2004. 355 p. (In Russian)
3. Gryaznev D.Yu. Aerovisual monitoring of the technical condition of a main oil pipeline exposed to exogenous geological processes. Bezopasnost zhiznedeiatelnosti. 2011; (8): 47–50. (In Russian)
4. Darevsky V.E., Romanov A.M., Tkacheva M.V. Automated engineering methods for calculating general stability of slopes and buildings. Promyshlennoe i grazhdanskoe stroitelstvo. 2006; (9): 16–21. (In Russian)
5. Dmitriev P.N., Golubev V.I., Isaev Yu.S., et al. Processing and interpretation satellite radar interferometry data on monitoring landslide processes. Sovremennye problemy distantsionnogo zondirovaniia Zemli iz kosmosa. 2012; 9 (2): 30–142. (In Russian)
6. Vibration standards for process gas pipelines of compressor stations with centrifugal superchargers. Available: http://docs.cntd.ru/document/1200003197 (accessed December 22, 2023). (In Russian)
7. Rekam F.V. Calculation of the permissible dynamic loads on a pipeline. Stroitelnaia mekhanika inzhenernykh konstruktsii i sooruzhenii. 2008; (3): 62–63. (in Russian)
8. Ding X., Yin S., Wang Y., Wang Y., Yang Y., Ni B. Data-driven design of observers and its applications. Available: www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1474667016305481 (accessed December 22, 2023)
9. Parker T., Farhadiroushan M., Handerek V.A., Roger A.J. A fully distributed simultaneous strain and temperature sensor using spontaneous Brillouin backscatter Letters. IEEE Photonics Technology. 1977. Available: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/593372 (accessed December 22,2023).
10. Priyanka E.B., Thangavel S., Gao X.Z. Review analysis on cloud computing based smart grid technology in the oil pipeline sensor network system. Petroleum Research. 2021; 6 (1): 77–90.
11. Rosen P., Hensley S., Joughin I., et al. Synthetic aperture radar interferometry. Proceedings of the IEEE. 2000; 88 (3): 333–382. Available: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/ (accessed September 5, 2023).
12. Rykov V., Kochueva O., Farkhadov M. Preventive maintenance of a k-out-of-n system with applications in subsea pipeline monitoring. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering. 2021; 9 (1): 85.
13. Tejedor J., Macias-Guarasa J. A novel fiber optic based surveillance system for prevention of pipeline integrity threats. Sensors. 2017; 17 (2): 355.
14. Thiberville C., Wang Y., Waltrich P. Modeling of smart pigging for pipeline leak detection. SPE Production and Operations. 2020; 35 (3): 610–627.
15. Thodi P., Paulin M., DeGeer D. Real-time Arctic pipeline integrity and leak monitoring. In: OTC Arctic Technology Conference. OnePetro, 2015. ISBN: 978-1-61399-431-3. Available: www.researchgate.net/publication/314698366_Real-time_Arctic_Pipeline_Integrity_and_Leak_ Monitoring (accessed December 22, 2023).
16. Varshney S., Kumar C., Swaroop A. Leach based hierarchical routing protocol for monitoring of over-ground pipelines using linear wireless sensor networks. Procedia Computer Science. 2018; 125: 208–214.
Review
For citations:
Burkov Р.V., Marina A.A. Development of automated monitoring for planned-high-altitude position control (Tomsk). Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo arkhitekturno-stroitel'nogo universiteta. JOURNAL of Construction and Architecture. 2023;25(6):139-151. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31675/1607-1859-2023-25-6-139-151. EDN: XNNNTL
Views:
179
Email this article 