Towards reliability of load-bearing beams of bridges (Tomsk)
https://doi.org/10.31675/1607-1859-2023-25-6-183-195
EDN: XACQYX
Abstract
One of the criteria for assessing the reliability of load-bearing elements of bridges, are peak values of the temporary mobile load significantly exceeding the standard level of loading. Peak loads are interpreted as a continuous random process in the form of a random pulse sequence manifested after a random period of time and having a random duration.
Purpose: The aim of the paper is to show changes in temporary mobile load over time in the form of a simple Poissonian flow, where the bridge load is independent, and repeatability and duration of the random load are independent random variables.
Research findings: Three cases are considered to determine sufficiently low probability of destructive temporary mobile loads during the given normative service life of bridges. Based on the failure types, the average failure-free operation of the beam is determined as well as the operating time for a possible failure with a prolonged or specific excess load.
Keywords
About the Authors
V. М. KartopoltsevRussian Federation
Vladimir M. Kartopoltsev, DSc, Professor
24/1, Solyanoy Str., 634003, Tomsk
A. V. Kartopoltsev
Russian Federation
Audrei V. Kartopoltsev, PhD, A/Professor
24/1, Solyanoy Str., 634003, Tomsk
A. A. Alekseev
Russian Federation
Аleksandr А. Alekseev, PhD, A/Professor
2, Solyanaya Sq., 634003, Tomsk
References
1. Augusti G., Baratta A., Casciati F. Probabilistic methods in structural engineering. Moscow: Stroyizdat, 1988. 573 p. (Russian translation)
2. Wen Y.K. Shochastic dependendies in load combination, proceedings. In: Proc. 3rd Int. Conf. ‘Structural Safety and Reliability’, Norwegian Institute of Technology, T. Moan, M. Shinozuka, Eds., Trondheim, 1981. Pp. 89–103.
3. Bulychev A.P., Sukhov Iu.D. Application of the reliability theory for normalisation of the calculated load values. SMRS. 1973; (4): 15–19. (In Russian)
4. Rzhanitsyn R.A. Calculation of structures for load combination. In: Reliability problems in building design. Sverdlovsk, 1972. Pp. 184–191. (In Russian)
5. Raizer V.D. Theory of reliability in construction design. Moscow: Izd-vo Assotsiatsii stroitelnykh vuzov, 1998. 302 p. (In Russian)
6. Volodin B.G., Ganin M.P., Diner I.Y., Komarov L.B., Sveshnikov A.A., Starobin K.B. Collection on probability theory, mathematical statistics and theory of random functions, A.A. Sveshnikov, Ed., Saint-Petersburg; Moscow; Krasnodar: Lan, 2008. 445 p. (In Russian)
7. Kartopol'tsev V.M., Kartopol'tsev A.V., Alekseev A.A. Towards predicting dynamic reliability of bridge spans. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo arkhitekturno-stroitel'nogo universiteta – Journal of Construction and Architecture. 2022; 24(6): 170–181. DOI: 10.31675/1607- 1859-2022-24-6-170-181 (In Russian)
8. Bolotin V.V. Combination of random loads of structures. Stroitelnaia mekhanika i raschet sooruzhenii. 1962; (2): 1–5. (In Russian)
9. Raizer V.D. Reliability of structures. Analysis and applications. USA: Backbone Publishing Company, 2009. 146 p. ISBN: 978-0974201979.
10. Tseitlin A.I., Guseva N.I. Calculation of structures on synchronous group impacts. Stroitelnaia mekhanika i raschet sooruzhenii. 1977; (6): 46–52. (In Russian)
11. Ditllevsen O, Madsen H.O. Structural reliability methods, 2nd ed., Department of Mechanical Engineering Technical University of Denmark, 2007. 373 p.
12. Tikhonov V.I. Emissions of random processes. Uspekhi fizicheskikh nauk. 1962; 77 (3): 449–480. (In Russian)
13. Raizer V.D. Methods of the theory of reliability in tasks of norming of building design parameters. Moscow: Stroyizdat, 1986. 186 p. (In Russian)
14. Racwitz R., Schrupp K. Quality control, prof testing and structural reliability. Structural Safety. 1985; 2: 239–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-4730(85)90030-X
15. Smirnov N.V., Dunin-Barkovskii I.V. Course of the theory of probabilities and mathematical statistics. Moscow, 1969. 329 p. (In Russian)
16. Timoshenko S.P. Strength and vibrations of structural elements. Moscow: Nauka, 1975. 704 p. (In Russian)
17. Sidorov V.I. Methods of reliability analysis of systems containing large number of elements. Izvestia AS USSR. 1954. (6): 3–12. (In Russian)
18. Faber M.H. On the treatment of uncertain-ties and probabilities in engineering decision analysis. Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering. 2005; 127(3): 243–248. DOI:10.1115/ 1.1951776.
19. Borovikov A.G., Kartopoltsev V.M. Assessment of load capacity of composite-girder bridge spans. Vestnik of Tomsk State University of Architecture and Building. 2013; (4): 273–279. (In Russian)
20. Gordeev V.N., Lantukh-Liashchenko A.I., Pashinskii V.A., Perelmuter A.V., Pichigin S.F. Loads and impacts on buildings. Moscow: Izd-vo Assotsiatsii stroitelnykh vuzov, 2006, 478 p. (In Russian)
21. Kartopoltsev V.M., Kartopoltsev A.V. Hybrid design of bridge span structures made of different strength steel. Vestnik of Tomsk State University of Architecture and Building. 2017; (3): 171–182. (In Russian)
Supplementary files
Review
For citations:
Kartopoltsev V.М., Kartopoltsev A.V., Alekseev A.A. Towards reliability of load-bearing beams of bridges (Tomsk). Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo arkhitekturno-stroitel'nogo universiteta. JOURNAL of Construction and Architecture. 2023;25(6):183-195. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31675/1607-1859-2023-25-6-183-195. EDN: XACQYX