Graph-analytic models and space syntax tools for planning structure characterization
https://doi.org/10.31675/1607-1859-2023-25-3-39-53
EDN: YSYCUK
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of the work is to identify the similarity and difference between three layouts created by the same technical specifications in order to study the design parameters, which may be inaccessible to the designer without the syntactic analysis.
Methodology/approach: Different approaches are considered in relation to space as an integral structure. Entropy and integration are used for the syntactic analysis, and j-graph is used for the stepwise depth analysis. Investigated are different works, and the precise mathematical tools for the analysis of the planning structure are chosen. The paper proposes the criteria evaluation of the effectiveness of each planning structure. A graph-analytic model is created.
Research findings: The method of parsing is explained in detail, with the selection of tools and spatial values that are appropriate for the objects in question. Criteria and conditions for evaluating the planning structure effectiveness are described. A further vector of work is outlined and the potential of syntactic analysis as a method of pre-project evaluation of work is shown.
Originality: The paper proposes the criteria evaluation of the planning structure effectiveness. A graph-analytic model is created.
Keywords
About the Authors
D. S. TseluikoRussian Federation
Dmitrii S. Tseluiko, A/Professor
136, Tikhookeanskaya Str., 680035, Khabarovsk
A. R. Kirpo
Russian Federation
Arina R. Kirpo, Student
136, Tikhookeanskaya Str., 680035, Khabarovsk
References
1. Karabtsev S.N., Stukolov S.V. Construction of the Voronoi diagram and determination of the boundaries of the region in the method of natural neighbors. Vychislitel'nye tekhnologii. 2008; (3): 65–80. (In Russian)
2. Tseluiko D.S. Graphic-analytical model of cultivation garden in Suzhou. Generation of planning structures with Rhinocerose (Grasshopper). Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo arkhitekturno-stroitel'nogo universiteta – Journal of Construction and Architecture. 2021; 23 (1): 58–72. DOI: 10.31675/1607-1859-2021-23-1-58-72 (In Russian)
3. Shubenkov M.V. Architectural space structure. DSc Thesis. Moscow, 2006. 335 p. (In Russian)
4. Asami Y., Kubat A., Kitagawa K, Iida S. Introducing the third dimension on SpaceSyntax: Application on the historical Istanbul. In: Proc. 4th Int. Space Syntax Symposium. London, 2003. Pp. 48.1–48.18.
5. Bondy J.U. Murty graph theory with applications. North-Holland: Elsevier Science Ltd., 1976. 264 p.
6. Garau C., Annunziata A., Yamu C. A walkability assessment tool coupling multi-criteria analysis and space-syntax: The case study of Iglesias. Italy, European Planning Studies, 2020.
7. Hillier B. Space is the machine. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996. 368 p.
8. Hillier B., Hanson J. The social logic of space. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986. 296 p.
9. Hillier B., Iida S. Network and psychological effects in urban movement. In: Proc. Int. Conf. ‘Spatial Information Theory’, A.G. Cohn, D. M. Mark, eds. Heidelberg Berlin, Springer, 2005. Pp. 475–490.
10. Hillier B., Penn A. Rejoiner to Carlo Ratti. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design. 2004; 31(4), Pp. 501–511.
11. Khairanisa F. Function, Role, Limitation, and potential of space syntax analysis in architectural field. Artificial Intelligence for Enhancing Architectural Design. 2022; 1 (2).
12. Nourian P., Rezvani S., Sariyildiz S. A syntactic architectural design methodology: Integrating real-time Space Syntax analysis in a configurative architectural design process. In: Proc. 9th Conf. ‘Space Syntax Symposium’. Seoul South Korea, 2013. Pp. 1–15.
13. Ostwald M.J. The mathematics of spatial configuration: Revisiting, revising and critiquing justified plan graph theory. Nexus Network Journal. 2011; 13 (2).
14. Tarabieh K., Nassar K., Abu-Obeid N., Malkawi F. The statics of space syntax: Analysis for stationary observers. International Journal of Architectural Research. 2018; 12 (1).
15. Van N.A., López M. Macro and micro scale spatial variables and the distribution of residential burglaries and theft from cars: An investigation of space and crime in the Dutchcities of Alkamaar and Gouda. Journal of Space Syntax. 2010; 2: 296–314.
16. Van N.A. The traditional half day DepthmapX workshop. Depthmap for new beginners. In: Proc. 13th Space Syntax Symposium. Bergen, Norway, 2022.
17. Xie Z. Exploration of the potential use of space syntax analysis in 3D parametric design: The case of Quamzhou, Thesis University College London, 2011.
Review
For citations:
Tseluiko D.S., Kirpo A.R. Graph-analytic models and space syntax tools for planning structure characterization. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo arkhitekturno-stroitel'nogo universiteta. JOURNAL of Construction and Architecture. 2023;25(3):39-53. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31675/1607-1859-2023-25-3-39-53. EDN: YSYCUK