Dynamic property control of bridge girders
https://doi.org/10.31675/1607-1859-2022-24-4-188-198
Abstract
The dynamic properties of bridge girders depend on the design solutions, namely the replacement of the roadway slab by the orthotropic, deviation from standard solutions in the formation of longitudinal schemes, and the use of a new type of supports causing the dissipation of vibration energy and gyropendulum effect.
The control for dynamic properties with regard to multifactorial defects, is characterized by ignoring the shock dampers of vehicles moving on the roadway. In this case, it is advisable to control the dynamic properties with regard to the energy dissipation of oscillatory processes within the internal and external strain boundaries, each of which can be functionally solved by the dependencies between the parameters of static and dynamic conditions of elasticity and plasticity. Long experience in diagnosing bridges under varying conditions of moving load allows identifying critical moments and limiting values of dynamic properties, at which the integrity of the span-vehicle system is violated. The difference in the operation of the system elements is complicated by the influence of a wide range of dynamic impacts, whose nature is opposite to the mechanical impact of vibra-
tion dampers such as all-round moving supports. In this case, the criterion for the dynamic property control are anti-phase vibrations of the girder and supports and their stiffness ratio. Based on the results, the dynamic property control includes the identification of the critical speed of the moving load based on various forms of energy of the deformed state of the structure, including resonance; conditions of the energy dissipation of the vibration process of the span-vehicle system; new parameters and requirements for bridge structures with controlled dynamic properties adequate to those of numerical simulation of bridge girders of 40 to 60 or 80 m and longer; optimization and modernization of bridge vibration-based diagnostics.
The control for dynamic properties with regard to multifactorial defects, is characterized by ignoring the shock dampers of vehicles moving on the roadway. In this case, it is advisable to control the dynamic properties with regard to the energy dissipation of oscillatory processes within the internal and external strain boundaries, each of which can be functionally solved by the dependencies between the parameters of static and dynamic conditions of elasticity and plasticity. Long experience in diagnosing bridges under varying conditions of moving load allows identifying critical moments and limiting values of dynamic properties, at which the integrity of the span-vehicle system is violated. The difference in the operation of the system elements is complicated by the influence of a wide range of dynamic impacts, whose nature is opposite to the mechanical impact of vibra-
tion dampers such as all-round moving supports. In this case, the criterion for the dynamic property control are anti-phase vibrations of the girder and supports and their stiffness ratio. Based on the results, the dynamic property control includes the identification of the critical speed of the moving load based on various forms of energy of the deformed state of the structure, including resonance; conditions of the energy dissipation of the vibration process of the span-vehicle system; new parameters and requirements for bridge structures with controlled dynamic properties adequate to those of numerical simulation of bridge girders of 40 to 60 or 80 m and longer; optimization and modernization of bridge vibration-based diagnostics.
Keywords
bridge girder,
dynamic property control,
vibrations,
resonance,
system,
diagnostics,
defects,
stiffness,
roadway,
dissipation,
damping
About the Authors
V. M. Kartopoltsev
OOO “Diamos”
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Vladimir M. Kartopoltsev, DSc, Professor
634003
24/1, Solyanoy Str.
Tomsk
A. V. Kartopoltsev
OOO “Diamos”
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Andrey V. Kartopoltsev, PhD, A/Professor
634003
24/1, Solyanoy Str.
Tomsk
References
1. Kartopoltsev A. V. Sovershenstvovanie metoda otsenki dinamicheskikh kharakteristik proletnykh stroenii balochnykh avtodorozhnykh mostov: Dissertatsiy na soiskanie uchenoi stepeni kandidata tekhnicheskikh nauk [Assessment improvement of dynamic properties of bridge girders. PhD Thesis]. Tomsk, 1998. 147 p. (rus)
2. Paltre P., Prouls J. Dynamic testing of Laroje–Scale Structures. Structural Engineering International. 1997. V. 7. No. 1. Pp. 29–34.
3. Bochkarev N. N., Kartopolsev A. V., Safronov V., Shendel A. S. Numerical modeling of experimental researches steel concrete of flying structures of road bridges. In: Proc. 9th Int. Sci. Conf. VSU, Sofia, Bulgaria. Pp. II–229, II–231.
4. Kartopoltsev V. M., Kartopoltsev A. V., Kolmakov B. D. Vliyanie defektov proezzhei chasti na izmenenie dinamicheskikh kharakteristik proletnykh stroenii mostov [Effect of trafficway defects on dynamic properties of bridge spans]. Vestnik of Tomsk State University of Architecture and Building. 2015. No. 6. Pp. 156–164. (rus)
5. Kartopoltsev A. V., Kartopoltsev V. M., Kukharenko S. A. K voprosu o dinamicheskom koeffitsiente [Towards the dynamic coefficient]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo arkhitekturno-stroitel'nogo universiteta – Journal of Construction and Architecture. 2021. V. 23. No. 5. Pp. 127–141. (rus)
6. Budkovoi A. N. Nestatsionarnye kolebaniya balochnykh sistem pri perekhodnykh rezhimakh vozdeistviya podvizhnoi nagruzki: avtoreferat dissertatsii na soiskanie stepeni kandidata tekhnicheskikh nauk [Unsteady oscillations of beam systems under transient modes of moving load. PhD Abstract]. Voronezh, 2014. 20 p. (rus)
7. Chzhao Tszyan', Belutskii I. Yu., Yatsura V. G. Otrazhenie vozdeistviya vremennoi nagruzki v dinamicheskom koeffitsiente pri raschete avtodorozhnykh mostov [Moving load in the dynamic coefficient in bridge analysis]. Uchenye zametki TOGU. 2013. V. 4. No. 4. Pp. 1657–1661. (rus)
8. Kartopolsev A. V., Bochkarev N. N., Selivanova T. V. The analysis of the compelled fluctuations of bridge structures in real operation conditions. In: Proc. Int. Conf. VSU’2005. Bulgaria. Sofia, 2005. V. 1. Pp. II 226−228.
9. Kattsyn P. A., Akimov B. G., Chikov S. A., Polubotko A. Yu., Kostarev D. A. Issledovanie napryazhenno-deformirovannogo sostoyaniya mosta cherez reku Tom' v gorode Tomske [Stress-strain state of bridge over the Tom River in Tomsk]. Vestnik of Tomsk State University of Architecture and Building. 2001. No. 2. Pp. 116–120. (rus)
10. Kartopoltsev V. M. Metallicheskie mosty s bistal'nymi balkami [Metal bridges with bisteel beams]. K. Kh. Tolmachev, Ed. Tomsk, 1992. 241 p. (rus)
11. Kartopoltsev V. M., Kartopoltsev A. V., Kukharenko S. A. K voprosu razvitiya metodov regulirovaniya dinamicheskikh kharakteristik proletnykh stroenii mostov [Towards dynamic property control of bridge spans]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo arkhitekturno-stroitel'nogo universiteta – Journal of Construction and Architecture. 2020. V. 23. No. 6. Pp. 201–219. (rus)
12. Kartopoltsev V. M., Safronov V. M., Kartopoltsev A. V., Kolmakov B. D. Opredelenie dinamicheskikh napryazhenii i deformatsii v stalezhelezobetonnykh mostakh [Stress-strain state of composite bridges]. Vestnik of Tomsk State University of Architecture and Building. 2016. No. 3. Pp.194–204. (rus)
13. Kartopoltsev A. V., Kartopoltsev V. M., Zgolich M. V. K voprosu o dissipativnosti deformirovaniya balok proletnykh stroenii mostov [Dissipative deformation of bridge span beams]. Vestnik of Tomsk State University of Architecture and Building. 2016. No. 2. Pp. 194–199. (rus)
14. Ibrahim R. A., Pilipchuk V. N., Ikeda T. Resent advances in liquid sloshing dynamics. Applied Mechanics Reviews. 2001. V. 54. No. 2. Pp. 133–199.
15. Rabotnov Yu. N., Suvorova Yu. B. Rasprostranenie uprugo-plasticheskikh voln v sterzhnyakh i balkakh s uchetom zapazdyvaniya tekuchesti [Propagation of elastic-plastic waves in rods and beams with flow delay]. PTMTF. 1968. No. 6. Pp. 193–198. (rus)
16. Skuchik E. Prostye i slozhnye kolebatel'nye sistemy [Simple and complex oscillatory systems]. Moscow: Mir, 1971. 552 p. (rus)
17. Kol'skii G. Volny napryazhenii v tverdykh telakh [Stress waves in solids]. Moscow, 1955. 192 p. (rus)
18. Rotenberg R. V. Podveska avtomobilya [Vehicle suspension]. Moscow, 1972. 395 p. (rus)
19. Rabotnov Yu. N., Suvorova Yu. V. Dinamika zhestko-plasticheskoi balki s zapazdyvaniem tekuchesti [Dynamics of rigid-plastic beam with yield delay]. MTT. 1968. No. 6. Pp. 78–86. (rus)
20. Kartopoltsev V. M. Primenenie bistal'nykh balok v proletnykh stroeniya avtodorozhnykh mostov. Avtoreferat dissertatsii na soiskanie uchenoi stepeni doktora tekhnicheskikh nauk [Bisteel beams in bridge girders. DSc Abstract]. Leningrad, 1991. 33 p. (rus)
Review
For citations:
Kartopoltsev V.M., Kartopoltsev A.V. Dynamic property control of bridge girders. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo arkhitekturno-stroitel'nogo universiteta. JOURNAL of Construction and Architecture. 2022;24(4):188-198. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31675/1607-1859-2022-24-4-188-198
Views:
251
Email this article 