<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">vestniktgasu</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Вестник Томского государственного архитектурно-строительного университета</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo arkhitekturno-stroitel'nogo universiteta. JOURNAL of Construction and Architecture</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">1607-1859</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2310-0044</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Tomsk State University of Architecture and Building</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.31675/1607-1859-2022-24-6-91-102</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">vestniktgasu-1360</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>АРХИТЕКТУРА И ГРАДОСТРОИТЕЛЬСТВО</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>ARCHITECTURE AND URBAN PLANNING</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Сравнительный анализ характеристик систем сертификации в градостроительстве</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Comparative analysis of certification systems in urban construction</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Каширипур</surname><given-names>М. М.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Kashiripoor</surname><given-names>M. M.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Каширипур Мохаммад Махди, канд. архитектуры, доцент</p><p>220013, г. Минск, пр. Независимости, 150</p><p> </p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Mohammad M. Kashiripoor, PhD, A/Professor</p><p>150, Nezavisimosti Ave., 220013, Minsk</p><p> </p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">mkashiripour@gmail.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Белорусский национальный технический университет</institution><country>Беларусь</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Belarusian National Technical University</institution><country>Belarus</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2022</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>20</day><month>12</month><year>2022</year></pub-date><volume>24</volume><issue>6</issue><fpage>91</fpage><lpage>102</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Каширипур М.М., 2022</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2022</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Каширипур М.М.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Kashiripoor M.M.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://vestnik.tsuab.ru/jour/article/view/1360">https://vestnik.tsuab.ru/jour/article/view/1360</self-uri><abstract><p>Концепция устойчивого развития была принята в начале 1990-х гг. и с тех пор получила широкое распространение в большинстве научных и промышленных отраслей. С момента появления этой концепции были предложены различные определения и применены разные методы для ее реализации.</p><p>В настоящее время устойчивое развитие города рассматривается на уровне общей стратегии и пока не разработано четких градостроительных критериев, методов проектирования города и его застройки, удовлетворяющих целям данного подхода. Сертификация как система обладает высокой важностью на межгосударственном уровне, но еще большую роль она играет в контексте устойчивого социального развития. Как правило, сертификация применяется для того, чтобы оценить устойчивость отдельных строений, зданий и иных образований градостроительства. Важность целей и задач, решаемых системой сертификации, актуализирует проблему разработки мер, направленных на адаптацию и поступательное развитие обозначенной системы под нужды современного градостроительства. </p><p>В статье рассматриваются актуальные вопросы сертификации и такие системы сертификации в сфере градостроительства, как DGNB, LEED, BREEAM, HQE, Green Star и CASBEE. Также проводится сравнительный анализ обозначенных систем сертификации. В заключении приведены результаты анализа этих систем, а также рассматриваются их преимущества и недостатки. Результат этой оценки может быть полезен для национальных и местных органов власти, урбанистов, проектировщиков, строителей, инвесторов и т. д. Следует добавить, что ни одна из рассмотренных систем сертификации не является универсальной, каждая из них обладает как преимуществами, так и недостатками. Можно сделать вывод, что применение систем сертификации в градостроительстве способствует устойчивому развитию поселений.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"/><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>устойчивое развитие</kwd><kwd>рейтинговая система сертификации</kwd><kwd>градостроительство</kwd><kwd>система оценки устойчивости</kwd><kwd>DGNB</kwd><kwd>LEED</kwd><kwd>BREEAM</kwd><kwd>HQE</kwd><kwd>Green Star</kwd><kwd>CASBEE</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>development</kwd><kwd>certification system</kwd><kwd>urban construction</kwd><kwd>assessment system</kwd><kwd>DGNB</kwd><kwd>LEED</kwd><kwd>BREEAM</kwd><kwd>HQE</kwd><kwd>Green Star</kwd><kwd>CASBEE</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Coplák J., Rakšányi P. Planning Sustainable Settlements. Slovakia, Bratislava : Slovak University of Technology, 2003. 112 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Coplák J., Rakšányi P. Planning sustainable settlements. Slovakia, Bratislava: Slovak University of Technology, 2003. 112 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Shen L.Y., Ochoa J.J., Shah M.N., Zhang X. The application of urban sustainability indicators – A comparison between various practices // Habitat international. 2011. V. 35(1). Pp. 17−29.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Shen L.Y., Ochoa J.J., Shah M.N., Zhang X. The application of urban sustainability indicators – A comparison between various practices. Habitat international. 2011. V. 35(1). Pp. 17−29.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">The DAC Guidelines: Strategies for Sustainable Development. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, 2001. 382 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">The DAC guidelines: Strategies for sustainable development. Paris: Organization for economic co-operation and development, 2001. 382 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Reed R., Bilos A., Wilkinson S., Schulte K.W. International comparison of sustainable rating tools. Journal of sustainable real estate. 2009. V. 1 (1). Pp. 1−22.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Reed R., Bilos A., Wilkinson S., Schulte K.W. International comparison of sustainable rating tools. Journal of Sustainable Real Estate. 2009. V. 1 (1). Pp. 1−22.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Каширипур М.М. Совершенствование архитектурно-планировочной структуры малых городов региона Ближнего Востока на основе концепции устойчивого развития : специальность 05.23.23 : диссертация на соискание ученой степени кандидата архитектуры. Минск, 2017. 186 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kashiripoor M.M. Sovershenstvovanie arkhitekturno-planirovochnoi struktury malykh gorodov regiona Blizhnego Vostoka na osnove kontseptsii ustoichivogo razvitiya: dissertatsiya na soiskanie uchenoi stepeni kandidata arkhitektury [Improvement of architectural and planning structure of small towns in the Middle East region based on development concept. PhD Thesis]. Minsk, 2017. 186 p. (rus)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Каширипур М.М. Методологические основы и критерии оценки архитектурнопланировочной структуры малых городов Ирана с учетом требований устойчивого развития // Архитектура : сб. научных трудов. Минск, 2016. Вып. 9. С. 138–142.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kashiripoor M.M. Metodologicheskie osnovy i kriterii otsenki arkhitekturno-planirovochnoi struktury malykh gorodov Irana s uchetom trebovanii ustoichivogo razvitiya [Methodological basics and evaluation criteria for urban structure and architecture of Iranian small city within sustainable development framework]. Minsk: Arkhitektura, 2016. V. 9. Pp. 138−142. (rus)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">BREEAM communities assessor manual development planning application stage SD5065B. Technical Manual. BRE Global Ltd, 2009. 184 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">BREEAM communities assessor manual development planning application stage SD5065B. Technical Manual. BRE Global Ltd, 2009. 184 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">LEED for neighborhood development a prescription for green healthy communities. Council, U.G.B. URL: http://www.greenhomeguide.org/livinggreen/led_for_neighborhood_development.html. (дата обращения: 15.03.2009).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">LEED for neighborhood development a prescription for green healthy communities. Council, U.G.B. Available: www.greenhomeguide.org/livinggreen/led_for_neighborhood_development.html. (accessed March 15, 2009).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kyvelou S., Baer I., Sinou M., Papadopoulos T. Developing a south-European eco-quarter design and assessment tool based on the concept of territorial capital. INTECH Open Access Publisher. 2012. P. 561−588.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kyvelou S., Baer I., Sinou M., Papadopoulos T. Developing a south-European eco-quarter design and assessment tool based on the concept of territorial capital. INTECH Open Access Publisher. 2012. Pp. 561−588.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Fowler K.M., Rauch E.M. Sustainable building rating systems summary. United States, Richland : Pacific Northwest National Lab.(PNNL), 2006. 55 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Fowler K.M., Rauch E.M. Sustainable building rating systems summary. United States, Richland: Pacific Northwest National Lab., 2006. 55 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">DGNB Certification System. Munich: DGNB (German Sustainable Building Council), 2008. 263 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">DGNB Certification System. Munich: German Sustainable Building Council, 2008. 263 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Green Star. Communities. Australia: Green Building Council of Australia, 2017. 40 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Green Star. Communities. Australia: Green Building Council of Australia, 2017. 40 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">CASBEE-City. Technical Manual. Japan : Japan Sustainable Building Consortium : Japan Sustainable Building Consortium : The committee for the development of an environmental performance assessment tools for cities, 2012. 63 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">CASBEE-City, Technical Manual. Japan Sustainable Building Consortium, The committee for the development of an environmental performance assessment tools for cities, 2012. 63 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Haapio A. Towards sustainable urban communities // Environmental Impact Assessment Review. 2012. V. 32. № 1. Pp. 165−169.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Haapio A. Towards sustainable urban communities. Environmental Impact Assessment Review. 2012. V. 32. No. 1. Pp. 165−169.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Sharifi A., Murayama A. A critical review of seven selected neighborhood sustainability assessment tools // Environmental Impact Assessment Review. 2013. V. 38. Pp. 73−87.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sharifi A., Murayama A. A critical review of seven selected neighborhood sustainability assessment tools. Environmental Impact Assessment Review. 2013. V. 38. Pp. 73−87.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Каширипур М.М. Рейтинговые системы оценки устойчивости в градостроительстве // Архитектура : сб. научных трудов. Минск : БНТУ, 2019. Вып. 12. С. 64−69.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kashiripoor M.M. Reitingovye sistemy otsenki ustoichivosti v gradostroitel'stve [Rating systems in urban design]. Minsk: Arkhitektura, 2019. V. 12. Pp. 64−69. (rus)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
